data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96c63/96c63fa74179c4f001326b3f8449479d5be6b42c" alt=""
The reason for the lack of support is perhaps because her statement was an open goal with PR disaster written all over it. The language of the original statement is bad enough, sorry he died and Christmas come early, can never be in the same statement however they are separated. But to then argue that "One could only misunderstand Arleen's post in such a manner with deliberate and malicious intent" is as equally misguided. The only sensible response is the throw hands up, admit to a cock-up made in the excitement of the moment of considering a by-election and then hide. To accuse left or right of acting in a scurrilous way loses you sympathy. This is a shame for Ms Ouzounian, this type of thing will undoubtedly be used by all her opponents to thwart her political career if she desires one, and this is prolonged by the failure to apologise and draw a line under the matter. Arleen is not innocent, she is not evil, no but she is guilty of a serious PR blunder and it will take a lot to rescue her reputation as a result. And the lesson: think before you blog!
3 comments:
I think you are quite wrong....
Fair enough, but would love to know why
She is ugly in appearance, but even uglier as a person.
Post a Comment